Social Network Sites - a (non) pedagogical-free zone?
Externer Link (Deutsch)

Keywords

Social Network Sites
Social Media
Social Work
Youth Work
pedagogical actions
professionalization

How to Cite

Stix, Daniela Cornelia. 2020. “Social Network Sites - a (non) Pedagogical-Free Zone? 2014. Deutsche Jugend, Nr. 12: 531–38. https://doi.Org/10.3262/DJ1412531”. MediaEducation: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education, no. Social Media in der OKJA (October). https://www.medienpaed.com/article/view/1149.

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Daniela Cornelia Stix

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Today, pedagogues from a wide variety of fields use social media and especially social network sites in their daily work. As a reaction to data protection concerns and a lack of rules on how to use the network, some German states issued guidelines on the use of social network sites in schools in 2013. These decrees, which differ widely in content, lead to uncertainty in fields and in federal states where no specifications exist.

On the one hand, this article is intended to provide orientation by focusing on the perspective of young people. It answers the question of what young people think about their youth workers and teachers being on social network sites and what interaction behaviour is perceived as (in)appropriate. To this end, the findings of various studies will be processed and summarised and finally transferred to the field of youth work. This also should encourage readers to develop rules of conduct together with the young people. Last but not least, thie paper can also be used as a pedagogical argumentation for use of social network sites in pedagogical fields.

References

Bitkom. 2014. «Jeder achte Lehrer ist mit Schülern in Sozialen Netzwerken verbunden (Pressemittei-lung)». http://www.bitkom.org/files/documents/BITKOM_Presseinfo_Lehrer_und_Soziale_Netzwerke_02_06_2014.pdf.

Hewitt, Anne, und Andrea Forte. 2006. «Crossing Boundaries: Identity Management and Student/Faculty Relationships on the Facebook». Poster presented at the ACM Special Interest Group on Com-puter-Supported Cooperative Work, Banff (Canada). 2006. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/ afor-te/HewittForteCSC- WPoster2006.pdf (Abruf: 12.12.2013).

hrOnline.de. o. J. «Infografik: Generation «Gefällt mir» – Wie die Jugend klickt. Daten basierend auf einer Studie von hrInfo und dem Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik der TU Darmstadt». Zuge-griffen 8. Juli 2014. http://www.hr-onli-ne.de/website/rubriken/nachrichten/indexhessen34938.jsp?rubrik=34954&key=standard_document_51349499.

Karl, Katherine A., und Joy V. Peluchette. 2011. «Friending Professors, Parents and Bosses: A Face-book Connection Conundrum». Journal of Education for Business 86 (4): 214–22.

Korfmacher, Susanne. 2011. «Online-Jugendarbeit. Ergebnisse der Umfrage zur Nutzung der Möglich-keiten von Web 2.0-Tools durch die Berliner Jugendfreizeiteinrichtungen». 2011. http://jugendnetz-berlin.de/de-wAssets/docs/04jugendarbeit/Studie_Jugendarbeit_Online_Endfassung.pdf (20.3.2014).

Kruse, Katja. 2002. «Mamas, Powerfrauen und Nervensägen». Freundinnengruppen und ihre Bedeutung für mädchengerechte Konzepte der Offenen Jugendarbeit: Freundinnengruppen und ihre Bedeu-tung für mädchengerechte Konzepte der offenen Jugendarbeit. St. Ingbert: Röhrig.

Mädchen.de. 2013. «Pro & Contra: Facebook-Freundschaften mit Lehrern?» 2013. http://www.maedchen.de/pro-und-contra/pro-contra-facebook-freundschaft-mit-lehrern-2026666.html (Abruf: 12.12.2013).

Malesky, L. Alvin, und Chris Peters. 2011. «Defining appropriate professional behavior for faculty and university students on social networking websites». Higher Education 63 (1): 135–51.

Mazer, Joseph P., Richard E. Murphy, und Cheri J. Simonds. 2007. «I’ll See You On Facebook: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learn-ing, and Classroom Climate». Communication Education 56 (1): 1–17.

Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. 2013. JIM - Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media: JIM ; Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger. Stuttgart. http://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/JIM-pdf13/JIMStudie2013.pdf (20.12.2013).

Ophus, John D., und Jason T. Abbitt. 2009. «Exploring the Potential Perceptions of Social Networking Systems in University Courses». MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 5 (4): 639–48.

Schorb, B., Matthieas Kießling, Maren Würfel, und Jan Keilhauer. 2010. «Medienkonvergenz Monitoring: Soziale Online-Netzwerke-Report 2010.» 2010. http://www.uni-leipzig.de/ umf-med/MeMo_SON10.pdf.

Statista GmbH. 2014. «Anzahl der aktiven Nutzer von Facebook in Deutschland von Januar 2010 bis Januar 2014». 2014. http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/70189/umfrage/nutzer-von-facebook-in-deutschland-seit-2009/.

Teclehaimanot, Berhane, und Torey Hickman. 2011. «Student-Teacher Interaction on Facebook: What Students Find Appropriate». TechTrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning 55 (3): 19–30.