Family-School Partnership and Technological Devices
PDF (Deutsch)

Keywords

Parents
School
Media Literacy
Media Education
Cooperation

How to Cite

Bonanati, Sabrina, Ricarda Kurock, Nicole Gruchel, and Heike M. Buhl. 2022. “Family-School Partnership and Technological Devices: Differences Between Families and Associations to Parents’ Internet Skills and Parental Mediation”. MediaEducation: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education 46 (Parents - Educators - Literacy):72-92. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/46/2022.01.15.X.

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Sabrina Bonanati, Ricarda Kurock, Nicole Gruchel, Heike M. Buhl

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Family-school partnership (FSP) offers possibilities to strengthen parents’ own internet skills and the appropriate choice of parental mediation strategies. Until now, there is little knowledge about FSP about technological devices in Germany. We investigated how parents perceived FSP about technological devices, differences in FSP regarding structural family characteristics, and the association of FSP to parents’ own internet skills and parental mediation strategies. N = 736 eleven-year-old students and N = 426 of their parents were investigated. Only a little FSP about technological devices was reported. Parents who were not born in Germany and reported lower educational degrees reported a higher extent of FSP. FSP was significantly negative related to parents’ own internet skills but not to parental mediation. Thus, parents who reported to be less competent in their internet skills perceived more FSP about technological devices. The results implicate that schools may react sensitively to parents’ needs. Furthermore, it is possible that parents who felt less competent with the internet were more aware of the information and invitations schools provided. Results can help to create more offers for parents as well as to design them in a way that is suitable for the target group.

https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/46/2022.01.15.X

References

Antony-Newman, Max. 2019. «Parental Involvement of Immigrant Parents: A Meta-Synthesis». Educational Review 71 (3): 362–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2017.1423278.

Baake, Dieter. 1998. «Medienkompetenz: Herkunft, Reichweite und strategische Bedeutung des Begriffs». In Lernort Multimedia, herausgegeben von Herbert Kubizek, 22–27. Heidelberg: v. Decker.

Bos, Wilfried, Irmela Buddeberg, und Eva-Maria Lankes, Hrsg. 2005. IGLU: Skalenhandbuch zur Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Münster: Waxmann.

Buhl, Heike M., Sabrina Bonanati, und Birgit Eickelmann. 2021. Schule in der digitalen Welt. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

Collier, Kevin M., Sarah M. Coyne, Eric E. Rasmussen, Alan J. Hawkins, Laura M. Padilla-Walker, Sage E. Erickson, und Madison K. Memmott-Elison. 2016. «Does Parental Mediation of Media Influence Child Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis on Media Time, Aggression, Substance Use, and Sexual Behavior.» Developmental Psychology 52 (5): 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000108.

Dedkova, Lenka, und David Smahel. 2020. «Online Parental Mediation: Associations of Family Members’ Characteristics to Individual Engagement in Active Mediation and Monitoring». Journal of Family Issues 41 (8): 1112–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X19888255.

Deursen, Alexander J.A.M. van, Ellen J. Helsper, und Rebecca Eynon. 2016. «Development and Validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS)». Information, Communication & Society 19 (6): 804–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1078834.

Finch, W. Holmes, Jocelyn E. Bolin, und Ken Kelley. 2019. Multilevel Modeling Using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Garmendia, Maialen, Carmelo Garitaonandia, Gemma Martínez, und Miguel Ángel Casado. 2012. «The Effectiveness of Parental Mediation». In Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet, herausgegeben von Sonia Livingstone und Leslie Haddon, 231–44. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847428837.003.0018.

Green, Christa L., Joan M. T. Walker, Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey, und Howard M. Sandler. 2007. «Parents’ Motivations for Involvement in Children’s Education: An Empirical Test of a Theoretical Model of Parental Involvement.» Journal of Educational Psychology 99 (3): 532–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.532.

Hertel, Silke, Simone Bruder, Nina Jude, und Brigitte Steinert. 2013. «Elternberatung an Schulen im Sekundarbereich. Schulische Rahmenbedingungen, Beratungsangebote der Lehrkräfte und Nutzung von Beratung durch die Eltern». In PISA 2009 - Impulse für die Schul- und Unterrichtsforschung, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, Beiheft; 59. herausgegeben von Nina Jude und Eckhard Klieme, 40–62. Weinheim: Betz Juventa.

Kalmus, Veronika, Lukas Blinka, und Kjartan Ólafsson. 2015. «Does It Matter What Mama Says: Evaluating the Role of Parental Mediation in European Adolescents’ Excessive Internet Use». Children & Society 29 (2): 122–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12020.

Kammerl, Rudolf, und Lutz Wartberg. 2018. «Zusammenhänge zwischen problematischer Internetnutzung im Jugendalter und Medienerziehung in der Familie». Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 67 (2): 134–53. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2018.67.2.134.

Killus, Dagmar, und Angelika Paseka. 2014. «Elterliches Engagement für das schulische Lernen des eigenen Kindes». In Eltern zwischen Erwartungen, Kritik und Engagement. Ein Trendbericht zu Schule und Bildungspolitik in Deutschland. Die 3. JAKO-O Bildungsstudie, herausgegeben von Dagmar Killus und Klaus-Jürgen Tillmann, 131–48. Münster: Waxmann.

Killus, Dagmar, und Angelika Padeka. 2020. Kooperation zwischen Eltern und Schule: Eine kritische Einführung in Theorie und Praxis. Weinheim: Beltz.

Kirwil, Lucyna. 2009. «Parental Mediation Of Children’s Internet Use In Different European Countries». Journal of Children and Media 3 (4): 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482790903233440.

Little, Todd. 2013. Longitudinal Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: Guilford press.

Livingstone, Sonia, und Ellen J. Helsper. 2008. «Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet Use». Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52 (4): 581–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396.

Livingstone, Sonia, Kjartan Ólafsson, Ellen J. Helsper, Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva, Giuseppe A. Veltri, und Frans Folkvord. 2017. «Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks for Children Online: The Role of Digital Skills in Emerging Strategies of Parental Mediation: Maximizing Opportunities and Minimizing Risks». Journal of Communication 67 (1): 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277.

MacKinnon, David P., und Amanda J. Fairchild. 2009. «Current Directions in Mediation Analysis». Current Directions in Psychological Science 18 (1): 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01598.x.

Manz, Patricia H., John W. Fantuzzo, und Thomas J. Power. 2004. «Multidimensional Assessment of Family Involvement among Urban Elementary Students». Journal of School Psychology 42 (6): 461–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2004.08.002.

Nikken, Peter, und Jeroen Jansz. 2014. «Developing Scales to Measure Parental Mediation of Young Children’s Internet Use». Learning, Media and Technology 39 (2): 250–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782038.

Nikken, Peter, und Marjon Schols. 2015. «How and Why Parents Guide the Media Use of Young Children». Journal of Child and Family Studies 24 (11): 3423–3435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0144-4.

Pfetsch, Jan. 2018. «Jugendliche Nutzung digitaler Medien und elterliche Medienerziehung – Ein Forschungsüberblick». Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie 67 (2): 110–33. https://doi.org/10.13109/prkk.2018.67.2.110.

R Core Team. 2020. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Rathgeb, Thomas, und Thomas Schmidt. 2019. JIM 2019. Jugend, Information, Medien. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 12. bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (mpfs). https://www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2019/JIM_2019.pdf.

Revelle, William. 2021. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research (Version 2.1.3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.

Rosseel, Yves. 2012. «Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling». Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.

Rubach, Charlott, und Sabrina Bonanati. 2021. «The Impact of Parents‘ School- and Home-Based Involvement on Adolescents‘ Intrinsic Motivation and Anxiety in Mathematics». Psychology in the Schools. http://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22577.

Sacher, Werner, Anne Sliwka, Sigrid Tschöpe-Scheffler, Sabine Walper, und Elke Wild. 2013. Qualitätsmerkmale schulischer Elternarbeit: Ein Kompass für die partnerschaftliche Zusammenarbeit von Schule und Elternhaus. Düsseldorf: Vodafone Stiftung. https://www.vodafone-stiftung.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/vfst_qm_elternarbeit_web.pdf.

Sasson, Hagit, und Gustavo Mesch. 2014. «Parental Mediation, Peer Norms and Risky Online Behavior among Adolescents». Computers in Human Behavior 33 (April): 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025.

Scariano, Stephen M., und James M. Davenport. 1987. «The Effects of Violations of Independence Assumptions in the One-Way ANOVA». The American Statistician 41 (2): 123–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1987.10475459.

Schwanenberg, Jasmin. 2015. Elterliches Engagement im schulischen Kontext: Analyse der Formen und Motive. Empirische Erziehungswissenschaft, Bd. 58. Münster: Waxmann.

Schwanenberg, Jasmin, Dominik Becker, Nele McElvany, und Nadja Pfuhl. 2013. «Elternpartizipation an Grundschulen unter Berücksichtigung des sozialen und kulturellen Familienhintergrunds.» Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung, herausgegeben von Nele McElvany, Miriam M. Gebauer, Wilfried Bos und Heinz G. Holtappels, 150–180. Weinheim: Beltz.

Symons, Katrien, Koen Ponnet, Kathleen Emmery, Michel Walrave, und Wannes Heirman. 2017. «A Factorial Validation of Parental Mediation Strategies with Regard to Internet Use». Psychologica Belgica 57 (2): 93–111. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.372.

Talves, Kairi, und Veronika Kalmus. 2015. «Gendered Mediation of Children’s Internet Use: A Keyhole for Looking Into Changing Socialization Practices». Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-4.

Wagner, Ulrike, Susanne Eggert, und Gisela Schubert. 2016. MoFam – Mobile Medien in der Familie: Langfassung der Studie. www.jff.de/studie_mofam.

Wagner, Ulrike, Christa Gebel, und Claudia Lampert, Hrsg. 2013. Zwischen Anspruch und Alltagsbewältigung: Medienerziehung in der Familie. Schriftenreihe Medienforschung der Landesanstalt für Medien Nordrhein-Westfalen 72. Berlin: Vistas-Verl. [u. a.].

Wiescholek [Bonanati], Sabrina. 2018. Lesen in Familien mit Family Literacy. Elterliche Unterstützung beim Lesekompetenzerwerb in der ersten Klasse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-658-20858-5.

Yotyodying, Sittipan, Swantje Dettmers, und Kathrin Jonkmann. 2020. «Quality Features of Family–School Partnerships in German Schools: Measurement and Association with Parent–Child Communication about School». Children and Youth Services Review 115 (August): 105078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105078.