From (Normative) Ideas to (Pedagogical) Practice
PDF (Deutsch)

Keywords

InDigO
OER
Educational Technology
Digital Transformation
Educational Research

How to Cite

Otto, Daniel. 2024. “From (Normative) Ideas to (Pedagogical) Practice: A Critical Review of 20 Years of OER from the Perspective of Design-Oriented Educational Research”. MediaEducation: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education 62 (InDigO):25-39. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/62/2024.07.02.X.

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Daniel Otto

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This paper examines the genesis of Open Educational Resources (OER) since its initiation in 2002. Germany, in particular, was minimally involved in developing and disseminating OER for a long time. However, various measures have made OER increasingly significant in Germany, particularly over the past decade. This paper outlines this development from the perspective of design-based media didactics. While an OER community mainly shaped the initial phase, there has been a shift towards a more structural incorporation of OER in higher education. The academic discourse has primarily focused on the reasons for and obstacles to the use of OER. This has led to significant insights, which are also beneficial for the further promotion of OER. Nevertheless, misunderstandings about OER persist, attributable to a more fundamental issue in the orientation of empirical educational research. However, the promotion of OER should not be based solely on the expectation of its impact on higher education per se but rather be understood as a potential to facilitate the transformation of education and universities. According to the thesis presented here, a more pragmatic stance is necessary for this transformation. This might entail enhancing the initially important and still influential bottom-up approach with a top-down perspective that addresses structural measures to ensure OER’s medium- and long-term promotion.

https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/62/2024.07.02.X

References

Abeywardena, Ishan. 2017. «A bottom-up approach to OER policy development». https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322255440_A_bottom-up_approach_to_OER_policy_development

Adil, Hafiz Muhammad, Shahbaz Ali, Mussarat Sultan, Murtaza Ashiq, und Muhammad Rafiq. 2022. «Open Education Resources’ Benefits and Challenges in the Academic World: A Systematic Review». Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Juli. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2022-0049.

Ahn, Soyeon, Allison J. Ames, und Nicholas D. Myers. 2012. «A Review of Meta-Analyses in Education». Review of Educational Research 82 (4): 436–76. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312458162.

Atkins, Daniel Ewell, John Seely Brown, und Allen L. Hammond. 2007. A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Bd. 164. Creative common Mountain View.

Beaven, Tita. 2018. «‹Dark reuse›: an empirical study of teachers’ OER engagement». Open Praxis 10 (4): 377. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.10.4.889.

Blessinger, Patrick, und T J Bliss. Hrsg. 2016. Open Education. Open Book Publishers. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1sq5v9n.

BMBF. 2022. «OER-Strategie Freie Bildungsmaterialien für die Entwicklung digitaler Bildung». Berlin: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). https://www.bmbf.de/SharedDocs/Publikationen/de/bmbf/3/691288_OER-Strategie.html.

Bohner, Gerd, und Nina Dickel. 2010. «Attitudes and Attitude Change». Annual Review of Psychology 62 (1): 391–417. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131609.

Buchner, Josef, und Michael Kerres. 2023. «Media comparison studies dominate comparative research on augmented reality in education». Computers & Education 195 (April): 104711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104711.

Buntins, Katja, Daniel Diekmann, Maria Klar, Marc Rittberger, und Michael Kerres. 2024. «Material teilen? Praktiken der Entwicklung und Nutzung digitaler Unterrichtsmaterialien von Lehrpersonen an Schulen in Deutschland». MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung (Occasional Papers): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/00/2024.01.10.X.

Burks, Arthur W. 1946. «Peirce’s Theory of Abduction». Philosophy of Science 13 (4): 301–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/286904.

Deimann, Markus. 2018. Open Education – Auf dem Weg zu einer offenen Hochschulbildung. Bielefeld: transcript.

Geurden, Bianca, Markus Jahn, Christina Josupeit, Sarah Schotemeier, Tassja Weber, Sinika Schäfer, und Anne Krüger. 2023. «OER in NRW – Was motiviert?; Was hindert?» Netzwerk Landesportal ORCA.nrw. https://www.orca.nrw/sites/default/files/dokumente/Umfrage_OER-in-NRW.pdf.

Hattie, John. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332.

Hodges, Charles, Stephanie Moore, Barb Lockee, Torrey Trust, und Aaron Bond. 2020. «The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning | EDUCAUSE». EduCause, 1–15.

Kerres, Michael. 2018. Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung digitaler Lernangebote. Oldenburg: de Gruyter.

Kerres, Michael. 2020a. «Mediendidaktik». In Handbuch Medienpädagogik, herausgegeben von Uwe Sander, Frederike von Gross, und Kai-Uwe Hugger, 116–22. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91158-8_13.

Kerres, Michael. 2020b. «Bildung in der digitalen Welt: Über Wirkungsannahmen und die soziale Konstruktion des Digitalen». MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung (Jahrbuch Medienpädagogik 17): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.04.24.X.

Koseoglu, Suzan, und Aras Bozkurt. 2018. «An exploratory literature review on open educational practices». Distance Education 39 (4): 441–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042.

Masalimova, Alfiya R., Maria A. Khvatova, Lyudmila S. Chikileva, Elena P. Zvyagintseva, Valentina V. Stepanova, und Mariya V. Melnik. 2022. «Distance Learning in Higher Education During Covid-19». Frontiers in Education 7 (März): 822958. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.822958.

Mayrberger, Kerstin. 2018. «Dokumentation der OER-Info Projekte 2017/2018». Synergie. Fachmagazin für Digitalisierung in der Lehre Sonderband: 284. https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.65.1.

Mishra, Sanjaya. 2017. «Open educational resources: removing barriers from within». Distance Education 38 (3): 369–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369350.

Niederastroth, Markus. 2018. «Strategie der Kultusministerkonferenz ‹Bildung in der digitalen Welt›». Strategie der Kultusministerkonferenz ‹Bildung in der digitalen Welt›. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783828869615.

Otto, Daniel. 2019. «Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OER) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OER-projects». International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 20 (5): 122–40. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472.

Otto, Daniel. 2020. «Grosse Erwartungen: Die Rolle von Einstellungen bei der Nutzung und Verbreitung von Open Educational Resources». MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung 2020 (Occasional Papers): 21–43. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/00/2020.02.26.x.

Otto, Daniel. 2022. «Die Förderung von Open Educational Resources (OER) in der Hochschule». Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 17 (2): 217–36. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-17-02/12.

Otto, Daniel, und Michael Kerres. 2021. «Deconstructing the virtues of openness and its contribution to Bildung in the digital age». In Bildung in the Digital Age, herausgegeben von David Kergel, Michael Paulsen, Jesper Garsdal, und Birte Heidkamp-Kergel, 47–63. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003158851-5.

Otto, Daniel, Michael Kerres, und Olaf Zawacki-Richter. 2022. Distributed Learning Ecosystems: Repositories, Resources and Practices. Wiesbaden: Springer Nature.

Otto, Daniel, Nadine Schroeder, Daniel Diekmann, und Pia Sander. 2021. «Trends and Gaps in Empirical Research on Open Educational Resources (OER): A Systematic Mapping of the Literature from 2015 to 2019». Contemporary Educational Technology 13 (4): ep325. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/11145.

Otto, Daniel, und Olaf Zawacki-Richter. 2023. «Same same but different – eine Betrachtung der Sonderausgabe aus deutscher Perspektive». Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung 18 (Sonderheft Hochschullehre): 37–50. https://doi.org/10.3217/zfhe-SH-HL/03.

Petko, Dominik. 2020. Einführung in die Mediendidaktik. Weinheim: Beltz.

Scharlau, Ingrid, und Tobias Jenert. 2023. «Evidenzbasierte Hochschuldidaktik». In Hochschulbildung: Lehre und Forschung, herausgegeben von Rüdiger Rhein und Johannes Wildt, 5:251–68. Bielefeld: transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839461808-014.

Stracke, Christian, Aras Bozkurt, Rory McGreal, und Olaf Zawacki-Richter. 2023. «Open Educational Resources and their global needs, benefits and practices: The call for a future research agenda». Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Learning Technology 23 (April): 20–23.

Tamim, Rana M., Robert M. Bernard, Eugene Borokhovski, Philip C. Abrami, und Richard F. Schmid. 2011. «What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning: A Second-Order Meta-Analysis and Validation Study». Review of Educational Research 81 (1): 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361.

Tlili, Ahmed, Juan Garzón, Soheil Salha, Ronghuai Huang, Lin Xu, Daniel Burgos, Mouna Denden, Orna Farrell, Robert Farrow, Aras Bozkurt, Tel Amiel, Rory McGreal, Aída López-Serrano, und David Wiley. 2023. «Are Open Educational Resources (OER) and Practices (OEP) Effective in Improving Learning Achievement? A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis». International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 20 (1): 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00424-3.

UNESCO IITE. 2019. «Understanding the Impact of OER: Achievements and Challenges». Moscow, Russian Federation: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education. 2019. https://iite.unesco.org/publications/understanding-the-impact-of-oer-achievements-and-challenges/.