Pedagogical and didactical challenges in the development of digital learning environments for lab-based teaching
PDF (Deutsch)

Keywords

Didactical Concepts
Engineering Sciences
Lab-based Learning
Self-directed Learning
Collaborative Learning
Mixed Reality
Design-Based Research
Learning Analytics
Open Badges
Evaluation

How to Cite

Schepkowski, David, Martin Burghardt, and Peter Ferdinand. 2020. “Pedagogical and Didactical Challenges in the Development of Digital Learning Environments for Lab-Based Teaching: Using the Example of the ’DigiLab4You’ Project”. MediaEducation: Journal for Theory and Practice of Media Education 17 (Jahrbuch Medienpädagogik):347-72. https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.05.14.X.

License

Copyright (c) 2020 David Schepkowski, Martin Burghardt, Dr. Peter Ferdinand

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

The progressing digitalization of university teaching provides teachers and educational researchers with new opportunities and challenges in the design of didactic concepts and learning environments. The project «Open Digital Lab 4 You» focuses on laboratories as places for experimenting, collaborating and testing practical skills within the framework of hybrid learning spaces in engineering sciences. This BMBF-funded collaborative project follows a design-based research approach and combines research questions from the fields of pedagogy and didactics with technical research questions in the context of the development of a hybrid teaching-learning environment. This results in a number of specific challenges: the lack of social presence, the attitude towards and acceptance of technologies and the advantages and disadvantages of mixed reality. The user prerequisites and the decisions based on them, as formulated by the Berlin Model, play an important role in the development of a learning environment. The presented article is intended to give an overview of the project and an excerpt from the theoretical foundations and raise awareness of the aforementioned challenges, so others can keep them in mind when planning a similar project.

https://doi.org/10.21240/mpaed/jb17/2020.05.14.X

References

Abulrub, Abdul-Hadi Ghazi, Alex Attridge, und Mark A. Williams. 2011. «Virtual Reality in Engineering Education: The Future of Creative Learning.» Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 6 (4). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v6i4.1766.

Adl-Amini, Bijan, und Rudolf Künzli, Hrsg. 1981. Ddaktische Modelle und Unterrichtsplanung. [2. Aufl.]. Juventa-Paperback. München: Juventa.

Ambrose, Stephen E. 1999. Duty, honor, country: A history of West Point / Stephen E. Ambrose. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Billinghurst, Mark, Adrian Clark, und Gun Lee. 2015. «A Survey of Augmented Reality.» FNT in Human–Computer Interaction 8 (2-3): 73–272. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000049.

May, Michael, Karen Skriver, und Gert Dandanell. «Technical and didactic problems of virtual lab exercises in biochemistry and biotechnology education.» In 41th SEFI Conference. Bd. 16, 20. https://www.sefi.be/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/18.pdf.

Davis, Fred D. 1985. «A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and results.» Doctoral dissertation.

Deci, Edward L., und Richard M. Ryan. 2008. «Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health.» Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49 (3): 182–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

Dennis, A. R., und J. S. Valacich. 1999. «Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity.» In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, 10: IEEE Comput. Soc.

Feisel, Lyle d., und Albert J. Rosa. 2005. «The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education.» Journal of Engineering Education 94 (1): 121–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.

Ginner, Michael. 2018. Akzeptanz von digitalen Zahlungsdienstleistungen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

Grodotzki, Joshua, Tobias R. Ortelt, und A. Erman Tekkaya. 2018. «Remote and Virtual Labs for Engineering Education 4.0.» Procedia Manufacturing 26:1349–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.126.

Hecker, Falk. 1997. Die Akzeptanz und Durchsetzung von Systemtechnologien: Marktbearbeitung und Diffusion am Beispiel der Verkehrstelematik. Saarbrücken: [s.n.].

Heimann, Paul, Gunter Otto, und Wolfgang Schulz. 1977. Unterricht: Analyse und Planung. 9., unveränd. Aufl. Auswahl Reihe B 1/2. Hannover: Schroedel.

Hodge, Hess, H. Scott Hinton und Michael Lightner. 2001. «Virtual Circuit Laboratory.» Journal of Engineering Education 90 (4): 507–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00632.x.

Kerres, Michael. 2018. Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung digitaler Lernangebote. Fifth edition. De Gruyter Studium. Boston, Massachusetts: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

Le Chenechal, Morgan, Thierry Duval, Valerie Gouranton, Jerome Royan, und Bruno Arnaldi. «Vishnu: Virtual Immersive Support for HelpiNg Users an Interaction Paradigm for Collaborative Remote Guiding in Mixed Reality.» In 2016 IEEE Third VR International 2016, 9-12. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7563559/.

Limbu, Bibeg Hang, Halszka Jarodzka, Roland Klemke, und Marcus Specht. 2018. «Using sensors and augmented reality to train apprentices using recorded expert performance: A systematic literature review.» Educational Research Review 25:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.07.001.

Long, Phillip. 2011. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge. New York, NY: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2090116.

McKenney, Susan, und Thomas C. Reeves. 2014. «Educational Design Research.» In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Bd. 13, hrsg. von J. M. Spector. Fourth edition, 131–40. New York: Springer.

Milgram, Paul, und Fumio Kishino. 1994. «A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays.» IEICE Trans. Information Systems vol. E77-D, no. 12: 1321–29. http://www.alice.id.tue.nl/references/milgram-kishino-1994.pdf.

Peterßen, Wilhelm H. 2000. Handbuch Unterrichtsplanung: Grundfragen, Modelle, Stufen, Dimensionen. 9., aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage. München: Oldenbourg.

Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. Riverside: Free Press.

Short, John, Ederyn Williams und Bruce Christie. 1976. The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.

Svajger, J., und V. Valencic. 2003. «Discovering electricity by computer-based experiments.» IEEE Trans. Educ. 46 (4): 502–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2003.817615.

Tu, Chih-Hsiung. 2000. «On-line learning migration: From social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment.» J. Network and Computer Applications 23:27–37. https://doi.org/10.1006/jnca.1999.0099.

Tu, Chih-Hsiung, und Marina McIsaac. 2002. «The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online Classes.» American Journal of Distance Education 16 (3): 131–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2.

Venkatesh, Morris, und Davis. 2003. «User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.» MIS Quarterly 27 (3): 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

«World‘s Oldest Laboratory?». 1990. Anal. Chem. 62 (13): 701A-701A. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00212a716.

Yanovich, Einat, und Omri Ronen. 2015. «The Use of Virtual Reality in Motor Learning: A Multiple Pilot Study Review.» APE 05 (03): 188–93. https://doi.org/10.4236/ape.2015.53023.

Zubía, Javier G., und Gustavo R. Alves. 2012. Using remote labs in education: Two little ducks in remote experimentation: Publicaciones De La Unive.